Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Soliman, Hatem
dc.contributor.advisor Shalakany, Amr
dc.contributor.advisor Sayed, Hani
dc.contributor.advisor Fahmy, Nabil
dc.contributor.author Badran, Samer Mohamed
dc.creator Badran, Samer Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-30T09:09:11Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-30T09:09:11Z
dc.date.created 2010 Spring
dc.date.issued 2010-05-30T09:09:11Z
dc.identifier.uri http://dar.aucegypt.edu/handle/10526/722
dc.description.abstract In the following thesis I will discuss arbitration, I will focus on who the court system in Egypt views as a party to the arbitration agreement, and will compare the Egyptian courts' view of parties to the arbitration agreement and the view adopted by western legal systems. The study will begin by viewing who might be considered a party upon the conclusion of the agreement, and will move on to view those who will become a party later on. The final stage is that of those who may be found to be a party to the arbitration agreement, after that I will conclude. en
dc.format.medium theses en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.rights Author retains all rights with regard to copyright. en
dc.subject.lcsh Thesis (L.L.M.)--American University in Cairo en
dc.title Arbitration: a comparative study en
dc.type Text en
dc.subject.discipline International and Comparative Law en
dc.rights.access This item is available en
dc.contributor.department American University in Cairo. Dept. of Law en


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses and Dissertations [721]
    This collection includes theses and dissertations authored by American University in Cairo graduate students.

Show simple item record