Arbitration: a comparative study

dc.contributor.advisor	Soliman, Hatem
dc.contributor.advisor	Shalakany, Amr
dc.contributor.advisor	Sayed, Hani
dc.contributor.advisor	Fahmy, Nabil
dc.contributor.author	Badran, Samer Mohamed
dc.creator	Badran, Samer Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned	2010-05-30T09:09:11Z
dc.date.available	2010-05-30T09:09:11Z
dc.date.created	2010 Spring
dc.date.issued	2010-05-30T09:09:11Z
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10526/722
dc.description.abstract	In the following thesis I will discuss arbitration, I will focus on who the court system in Egypt views as a party to the arbitration agreement, and will compare the Egyptian courts' view of parties to the arbitration agreement and the view adopted by western legal systems. The study will begin by viewing who might be considered a party upon the conclusion of the agreement, and will move on to view those who will become a party later on. The final stage is that of those who may be found to be a party to the arbitration agreement, after that I will conclude.	en
dc.format.medium	theses	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.rights	Author retains all rights with regard to copyright.	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Thesis (L.L.M.)--American University in Cairo	en
dc.title	Arbitration: a comparative study	en
dc.type	Text	en
dc.subject.discipline	International and Comparative Law	en
dc.rights.access	This item is available	en
dc.contributor.department	American University in Cairo. Dept. of Law	en